Our Offshore Lawyers Worldwide Anguilla Sao Paulo British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Cyprus Vancouver Hong Kong London Montevideo Singapore Tokyo Shanghai Bermuda
English
Русский
Português
Español
简体中文

Legal Updates

Developments in law or practice in our jurisdictions

The Offshore Advantage: M&A in the BVI

Author:
Publication Date:
19 October 2017

As the largest law firm in the BVI, Harneys has consistently worked on the biggest and most complex mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving BVI companies. As we head into the last quarter of 2017, M&A both globally and in the BVI in particular continues to be an active and vibrant market despite global geopolitical concerns. 

Transactions the firm has been involved with in the last two years alone have included one of the highest value take private transactions in BVI history (UTi Worldwide) by way of statutory merger, the reverse takeover of Knowlton Capital Inc by LeniGas Cuba Limited by scheme of arrangement, and the largest ever domestic M&A transaction (the acquisition by share purchase of a majority stake in Road Town Wholesale Trading Ltd) as well as countless confidential deals.

The BVI’s modern and flexible corporate statute, the BVI Business Companies Act 2004 (the Act) is specifically designed to facilitate these types of transaction, and the ease of exit continues to be a key factor driving the use of BVI structures for global investments. This article reflects on some of the reasons why the BVI continues to be at the forefront of global M&A. 
 

Variety of acquisition structures


Perhaps the biggest advantage of the BVI is the range of possible acquisition tools, illustrated by the range of recent transactions Harneys has been involved with. 

There are four main methods of acquiring a BVI company: (i) a straightforward share purchase or contractual offer, (ii) a statutory merger, (iii) a scheme of arrangement and (iv) a plan of arrangement. Ultimately, which structure is most appropriate will depend on the facts of a particular case, including the nature of the selling entity, the onshore tax treatment and the preferences of individual clients and their advisers (US based clients, for example, may have a preference for mergers as the mechanism most often used in their home jurisdiction). 


Contractual offer/Share purchase


Probably the simplest and still the most common way of conducting an M&A transaction is a contractual share purchase, where the existing shareholder(s) agree to sell and the buyer(s) agree to buy the shares. Although from a BVI legal perspective the only document required for a transfer of shares is a written share transfer instrument (a short, straightforward one page document) in all but the simplest intragroup transaction there will also be a share purchase agreement (SPA) setting out the commercial terms of the sale. The SPA will set out the consideration structure and any adjustment mechanics; buyer protection in the form of representations, warranties and indemnities; seller protections such as limitations on liability and disclosure; deal with any conditionality; and set out the completion arrangements, the last of which will be the only part of the SPA in which BVI law will be a major factor and which is seldom controversial. Provided the basic requirements of BVI law are adhered to, there is no issue with buying or selling BVI shares using an SPA governed by a foreign law.

The only real disadvantage of the contractual offer structure is that in the context of a company with a large shareholder base it only binds shareholders who are willing to sell, although this risk to the buyer can be managed contractually (for example through conditionality in the purchase agreement). If a buyer ultimately acquires more than 90 per cent of the issued shares he can avail himself of mandatory squeeze-out provisions under BVI law. 
 

Statutory merger


When the BVI first introduced its merger code, the drafters looked at Delaware and Canada for guidance and the provisions of the Act will be familiar to anyone with experience of mergers in North America.  

The key procedural requirement is that the directors of each constituent company must approve a Plan of Merger setting out the details of the parties and the terms of the merger.1 This must also be approved by the shareholders, unless the merger is between a subsidiary and a parent (unlikely in an M&A deal). Unless a higher threshold has been specified in the Mem & Arts the approval threshold is a simple majority vote.

The parties will also need to execute Articles of Merger and file these with the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the BVI. The merger is effective when these documents are accepted by the Registry, which recently introduced a premium service for faster turnaround on major deals (on the UTi transaction mentioned above, within 30 minutes of filing). 

A merger may be between two BVI companies (often a BVI SPV established by the buyer for that purpose) or between a BVI company and a foreign entity. Regardless of whether the target company or the merger sub is the surviving entity, the obligations and assets of the BVI target will flow to the surviving entity.

Similar to the role of an SPA on a contractual offer, the relatively straightforward BVI documents are likely to be supplemented with a longer Merger Agreement, setting out in more detail and putting on a contractual basis the commercial terms of the merger.
 

Scheme of arrangement


A scheme of arrangement is a statutory, court sanctioned process, which was initially envisaged as a restructuring tool, but which has become a popular method of acquiring companies in a number of common law jurisdictions (in particular the UK, where it is used for the vast majority of public takeovers). The process involves the applicant (invariably the target company) first seeking a court order to call a meeting of the effected ‘creditors’ (the shareholders). If the transaction is approved by more than 50 per cent in number and 75 per cent in value of the members of each ‘class’2 of creditors, it will proceed to a court hearing for final approval (‘sanction’). The key documents are the various court applications and supporting documents and the circular to members. 

There may also be an ‘implementation deed’ or some other form of contractual framework between the buyer and target company setting out the terms on which they will cooperate to pursue the scheme. 

Since Harneys acted on the BVI’s first takeover by scheme of arrangement in 2010 there have been a number of others, although the cost and relative complexity of involving the court means that it is not suitable for every transaction. Schemes do have the key advantage that court sanction makes it virtually impossible for them to be subsequently challenged or derivative actions brought by aggrieved shareholders. 

Another benefit is that the scheme is binding on all shareholders and the right to dissent and claim fair value for shares under section 179 of the BCA is only permitted ‘if the court allows’ and is not automatic (a right which otherwise applies for various corporate transactions including mergers and mandatory squeeze-outs). Consequently, for reasonably large M&A transactions where a comfortable majority of shareholders are likely to be in favour but a minority will be stringently opposed, a scheme can be the ideal instrument to give both the buyer and the target company management certainty and minimize post-closing legal risk. 
 

Plan of arrangement


A plan of arrangement is a statutory process similar to a scheme which can be used for mergers, consolidations, and sales of shares or assets (and certain other corporate actions). The BVI legislation is closely modeled on the statute in Canada, where plans are a common alternative to statutory mergers. 

A plan of arrangement can be initiated by the directors of a BVI company if they have determined it is in the best interests of the company and relevant third parties (eg the shareholders and/or creditors). The directors will apply for the court for an order approving the plan, and it is at the discretion of the court to determine who is required to be given notice of the transaction and what additional approvals, if any, are required. In theory, this opens the possibility that the directors could use a plan to sell the company without getting approval from or even giving notice to the shareholders, although in practice it would be very unlikely that a court would approve such a transaction. 

While plans have not yet been widely used for takeovers in the BVI, Harneys acted on the first ever plan of arrangement in the BVI under the Act and it represents a potentially simpler and more cost effective alternative to a scheme in some circumstances. 
 

Flexible corporate law


While it would be a slight exaggeration to say that the answer to any BVI corporate law question is ‘yes, if the Mem & Arts allow it’, it is certainly true that the BVI corporate regime is extremely flexible. This flexibility means that it is very rare for a purely legal issue to delay closing a BVI deal. 

There are a few key differentiators between the BVI and many other jurisdictions which can be helpful in the context of an M&A transaction:  

No need for an extensive tax covenant and no transfer taxes


There is no stamp duty levied in the BVI on a transfer of share in a BVI company unless the company owns a direct or indirect interest in BVI property. As there are no corporate taxes in the BVI (assuming no property, employees or business being conducted in the BVI) there is usually no need for a complicated and heavily negotiated tax covenant apportioning pre-completion taxes and reliefs. 
 

The common law edge


The legal system in the BVI is based on English common law, while its corporate statute has taken provisions and best practices from a range of jurisdictions including the US (principally Delaware), UK, Canada and Australia. As a result, BVI corporate law works harmoniously with the law of contract in other common law countries, and it is not unusual to have the principal transaction documents governed by a different governing law – for example a US law governed merger agreement or an English law governed SPA. 

When the parties do decide to use BVI as a governing law, or where the choice of acquisition tool mandates it (such as a scheme of arrangement) they get access to a sophisticated legal system with ultimate appeal to the UK Privy Council. In addition, English case law is persuasive in the BVI, which means that lawyers have the advantage of a huge body of precedent from the world’s second largest legal jurisdiction for M&A transactions. 
 

Conclusion


The BVI is one of the easiest countries in the world in which to undertake everything from billion dollar mega-mergers to the sale of non-trading holding companies owning a few acres of real estate. The diversity of acquisition options, allied with a flexible corporate legal system means that a structure can be found that will suit any client’s needs. The BVI Government and regulators recognize the importance of keeping the jurisdiction ahead of its peers, and Harneys works closely with these bodies and other industry stakeholders to develop innovative solutions and ensure that it evolves to meet the demands of clients around the world. Harneys continues to be at the forefront of this exciting area of law, and involved with some of the largest and most innovative transactions taking place today.
 

 

1The plan must include: (i) the name of each constituent company to the merger; (ii) the name of the surviving company in the merger; (iii) in respect of each constituent company the designation and number of outstanding shares of each class of shares the number of shares of each class of shares in each subsidiary company owned by the parent company; (iv) the terms and conditions of the proposed merger including the manner and basis of converting shares in each company to be merged into shares, debt obligations or other securities in the surviving company, or money or other assets, or a combination thereof; and statement of any amendment to the memorandum or articles of the surviving company to be brought about by the merger.
 

2Calculating the relevant classes for the purposes of a scheme is not straightforward (it does not follow that because a company only has one class of shares in issue, they can all vote as one class on a scheme). Under case law, “a class must be confined to those persons whose rights are not so dissimilar as to make it impossible for them to consult with a view to their common interest”.

3Fundamental changes to the Mem & Arts may require shareholder approval. In addition the Mem & Arts may set out a higher threshold for certain decisions. Finally, as noted above, the threshold for approval of various different acquisition structures varies.