Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
  • Hazel-Ann Hannaway

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Shanghai
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

English Court of Appeal holds s236 Insolvency Act Examinees Immune from Suit

The English Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Al Jaber v Mitchell confirmed (for the first time in the English Courts) that directors examined under section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 enjoy the same level of immunity from suit that other participants to legal proceedings are afforded.

The case arises out of the BVI liquidation of MBI International & Partners Inc. The BVI-appointed liquidators of MBI obtained recognition in England as "foreign representatives" under the UNCITRAL Model Law and thereafter sought to examine various persons involved with MBI, including the respondent, under s236 of the IA 1986. In substance, section 236 empowers the Court to summon and examine any officer of a company in liquidation; any person known or suspected of having property belonging to the company, or being indebted the company; or any person the Court thinks capable of giving information about the promotion, formation, business, affairs, dealings or property of the company.

Having conducted their s236 examinations, the liquidators then sought to amend their points of claim in an action already before the English High Court to allege certain breaches of duty against the respondent in his capacity as a director of MBI. The respondent unsuccessfully contested the application to amend at first instance on the basis that the amendments arose out of the information given in the s236 examination.

On appeal, the Court held in favour of the respondent that:

  • a s236 examination is clearly part of a wider “judicial proceeding”,
  • it follows that liquidators will have immunity from suit in respect of the questions they ask or things said in the examination (drawing an analogy with the Court of Appeal’s earlier decision in Mond v Hyde [1999] QB 1907 CA), and
  • it would be a curious situation if the Judge and liquidator enjoyed immunity but the examinee did not.

This decision will no doubt be of relevance in other common law jurisdictions that provide similar regimes for Court-based examinations of company officers and other relevant persons.

English Court of Appeal holds s236 Insolvency Act Examinees Immune from Suit

Leave A Comment