Our Offshore Lawyers Worldwide Anguilla Sao Paulo British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Cyprus Vancouver Hong Kong London Montevideo Singapore Tokyo Shanghai Bermuda


Legal analysis by Harneys lawyers

Implementation of MiFID II in Cyprus: Enhanced investor protection

Publication Date:
10 November 2017

This is the second in a series of articles on the implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU, (MiFID II), in Cyprus. Below we explore changes to the local industry that mandates greater investor protection. The Investment Services and Investment Activities and Regulated Markets Law 2017 (New IS Law) gives full effect to MiFID II in Cyprus and will from 3 January 2017 repeal and replace the legislative framework currently in place which implements Directive 2004/39/EC, or (MiFID I). For an overview of the implementation of MiFID II in Cyprus, please refer to our previous article here.

Increased safeguarding of client assets

The New IS Law bans the use of title transfer collateral arrangements (TTCAs) with retail clients for the purpose of securing or covering present or future, actual or contingent, or prospective obligations.

CySEC has also recently released directive DI87-01 on the safeguarding of client financial instruments and funds, product governance requirements and rules on the provision or receipt of payments, commissions and other monetary or non-monetary benefits (CySEC Directive), which implements Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 (Delegated Directive). The CySEC Directive provides that firms must now also consider the appropriateness of using TTCAs with non-retail clients. In addition, a single officer of sufficient skill and authority must now be appointed with specific responsibility for matters relating to the firms’ compliance with their obligations on safeguarding of client assets.

Tightening of remuneration policies

The New IS Law introduces a number of restrictions on the incentives and rewards which may be given to sales staff working with both retail and professional clients. Key requirements in this respect include the following:
The CySEC Directive also provides further guidance in line with the provisions of the Delegated Directive in this respect, including for example on cases where the provision of research may not be considered to constitute remuneration.

Restrictions on inducements and commissions in advised sales

The new regime expands on the existing provisions restricting or prohibiting inducements. The New IS Law introduces a crucial distinction between the provision of independent and non-independent advice. When investment advice is provided, investment firms are required to inform clients in good time prior to providing the investment whether or not the advice is provided on an independent basis, and further whether the advice is based on a broad or on a more restricted analysis of different types of financial instruments and, in particular, whether the range is limited to financial instruments issued or provided by entities having close links with the advisor or any other legal or economic relationships which pose a risk to impartiality of the advice.

Of particular note is the fact that for investment advice to be considered independent, an advisor cannot accept fees, commissions or other benefits. Only minor payments may be accepted in certain very restricted circumstances. The CySEC Directive further provides that any remuneration, commissions or monetary benefits which a firm receives from the third parties in relation to providing investment advice on an independent basis or portfolio management must be passed on in their entirety to the client.

Changes to appropriateness assessment requirements

The legislation currently in place provides that investment firms are not required to carry out an appropriateness assessments where the service provided is ‘execution only’ and the relevant financial instruments are listed shares, money market instruments, bonds or other forms of securitised debt, UCITS funds or other non-complex financial instruments. The New IS Law modifies the financial instruments in relation to which an appropriateness assessment is not required, as follows:

Developments in relation to eligible counterparties

The New IS Law seeks to extend the investor protection obligations of investment firms towards with eligible counterparties. Under the current legislative framework, investment firms are not required to observe a number of investor protection requirements when dealing with eligible counterparties. The New IS Law expands such investor protection requirements on investment firms when dealing with eligible counterparties to include the following key obligations:

Product governance

The New IS Law also introduces a new regime for product governance, with particular focus on the obligations of product manufacturers and distributors.

More specifically, an investment firm which manufactures financial instruments is now required to maintain, operate and review a process for the approval of each financial instrument and significant adaptations of existing financial instruments before it is marketed or distributed to clients. The product approval process must specify an identified target market of end clients within the relevant category of clients for each financial instrument and should ensure that all relevant risks to such target market are assessed and that the intended distribution strategy is consistent with the identified target market. Manufacturers must also provide distributors with all appropriate information on the financial instrument and the product approval process.

Manufacturers are also required to ensure that financial instruments are designed to meet the needs of the identified target market of end clients within the relevant category of clients, that the strategy for distribution of the financial instruments is compatible with the identified target market. To this end, the investment firm is required to take reasonable steps to ensure that the financial instrument is distributed to the identified target market.

In turn, investment firms which offer or recommend financial instruments which they do not manufacture must have in place adequate arrangements to understand the characteristics and identified target market of each financial instrument. An investment firm must understand the financial instruments they offer or recommend, assess the compatibility of the financial instruments with the needs of the clients to whom it provides investment services, also taking account of the identified target market of end clients, and ensure that financial instruments are offered or recommended only when this is in the interest of the client.

Investment firms are also required to undertake regular reviews of the financial instruments they offer or market.

Transaction reporting

Under MiFIR, transaction reporting requirements for investment firms have been expanded, both to cover a greater range of financial instruments but also to require additional mandatory information to be provided. In particular, increased transaction reporting will be required in respect of financial instruments admitted to or traded on a trading venue. Certain obligations are now also imposed on firms which only receive and transmit orders, but do not execute such orders.

Product intervention powers

MiFIR grants to ESMA (under Article 40) and to EU national competent authorities such as CySEC (under Article 42) certain product intervention powers allowing them to intervene. Measures adopted by ESMA under Article 40 are temporary and cannot exceed 3 months. However, at the end of the 3 months, ESMA may renew a measure.

Measures adopted by ESMA apply across Member States in the same manner.
Measures adopted by EU national competent authorities can be permanent. Measures adopted by a national competent authority may apply to market participants established in the jurisdiction of the national competent authority adopting the measure as well as to market participants established in other Member States that carry out business in that jurisdiction. Accordingly, any product intervention powers exercised by CySEC would apply to CIFs or to market participants carrying on business in Cyprus.

Although no announcements have been made yet stating that this tool will be used to curb the sale of CFDs, binary options and other speculative products within the EU, ESMA has released a public statement in this regard on 29 June 2017 stating that it is in the process of discussing the use of its product intervention powers under Article 40 of MiFIR, and further confirming that the measures being discussed in relation to contracts for difference, rolling spot forex and binary options include proposals that take into account a number of measures that have already been adopted or publicly consulted on by certain EU national competent authorities. ESMA in this respect refers to measures include leverage limits, guaranteed limits on client losses, and/or restrictions on the marketing and distribution of these products.