Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
  • Hazel-Ann Hannaway

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Shanghai
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

The High Court of Justice of England and Wales considers the impact of business interruption on a proposed transfer of insurance business

In the recent case of Re Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd and another company, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales granted an adjournment in respect of an application to sanction a scheme for the transfer of insurance business (Scheme) due to the effects of COVID-19 but refused to give a current indication as to whether it will sanction the Scheme.

Legal and General Assurance Society Limited (LGAS) and ReAssure Ltd (ReAssure) applied for sanction of a scheme to transfer LGAS’s insurance business to ReAssure. The applicants originally required the Court’s decision by 24 March 2020 with the transfer taking place in early April, but later applied for an adjournment because the challenges presented by COVID-19 meant that the mechanics of the migration may not proceed as planned. In addition, the applicants also sought an indication from the Court as to whether it was minded to sanction the Scheme save for the issues which had arisen due to COVID-19.

A policyholder objected to the Court giving judgment which would in effect, pre-approve the Scheme. The Financial Conduct Authority also noted that any judgment given now on the matters raised to date could not fetter the Court’s discretion at the adjourned hearing to determine the application by reference to the circumstances at that time.

The Court granted the adjournment but would not give an indication as to whether it would sanction the Scheme. It held that in granting sanction, the ultimate question is whether it is appropriate to do so in all the circumstances of the case. The circumstances must be those existing at the date the Court is asked to sanction the Scheme, namely the date of the adjourned hearing. Currently, it is impossible to know this. A judgment produced now may end up creating more work later with the need to compare the circumstances now and those at the adjourned hearing. Nevertheless, the Court noted that any potential waste of judicial time can be mitigated by reserving the matter to the same Judge and not requiring submissions on issues where there had been no change in circumstances.

This is an indication of the pragmatic approach that the Court is likely to take in relation to business disruption faced by enterprises in the current economic climate.

The High Court of Justice of England and Wales considers the impact of business interruption on a proposed transfer of insurance business

Leave A Comment