Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
  • Hazel-Ann Hannaway

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Shanghai
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

Extra-territorial scope of the Cayman Islands Fraudulent Dispositions Law

In the recent Cayman Islands decision of Raiffeisen International Bank AG v Scully Royalty Ltd and others, the Grand Court has considered the little utilised asset enforcement tool contained in the Fraudulent Dispositions Law (the FDL).

In Raiffeisen, the plaintiff Austrian bank successfully obtained a worldwide freezing injunction in aid of its claims against a guarantor company and others incorporated in the Cayman Islands, British Columbia, the Marshall Islands and Malta. The bank alleged that the defendants had stripped the guarantor’s assets for the purpose of putting them out of the reach of the bank, and that the dispositions of these assets were caught by the FDL such that they should be set aside and the assets (or their value) be restored to the guarantor. The bank intended to enforce the guarantee once the assets had been restored.   

The FDL provides that dispositions of property made with an intent to defraud and at an undervalue are voidable on the application of a prejudiced creditor. The phrase “intent to defraud” is defined within the FDL to mean an intention to willfully defeat an obligation owed to a creditor. A disposition is set aside under the FDL only to the extent necessary to satisfy the obligation owed to the applying creditor, plus costs.

In ordering that the bank’s injunction should remain in place, the Court gave clarification on the following aspects of the FDL:

  • The FDL has extra-territorial effect, and could apply to dispositions between non-Cayman Islands entities provided the Court’s jurisdiction was otherwise enlivened.
  • The intention to defeat a creditor need only be "a" purpose of the disposition, but does not have to be the sole or dominant purpose.
  • While the Court may only set aside the disposition “to the extent necessary” to satisfy the obligation owing the applicant creditor, in circumstances where the debtor is insolvent the Court may require that a greater amount be restored. The reason for this is that the restored assets would be distributed parri passu with all creditors, and so the Court could require restoration of as much of the disposition as needed to ensure that all creditors would be paid in full (including the applicant creditor).

The FDL is often overlooked but, as Raiffeisen demonstrates, it is a potentially powerful and flexible tool for creditors addressing cross border asset enforcement issues.

Extra-territorial scope of the Cayman Islands Fraudulent Dispositions Law