Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
Hazel-Ann Hannaway
  • Hazel-Ann Hannaway

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Shanghai
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

Creditor petitions and attempts to adjourn in the times of COVID: In re GBC Oil Company Ltd

A short decision recently released by the Financial Services Division of the Cayman Islands Grand Court serves as a helpful reminder of certain principles concerning creditor petitions presented on the grounds of a company’s inability to pay its debts: In re GBC Oil Company Ltd.

Amongst those principles are the following:

  1. It is well established that secured creditors, like unsecured creditors, have standing to petition for the winding up of a company. Secured creditors do not have to elect between their security and participating in the winding up until after a winding up order has been made.
  2. Non-payment of a single undisputed debt can be sufficient to satisfy the Court of an inability to pay debts.
  3. It is insufficient for the company merely to allege that the debt is disputed. There must be a positive statement of the grounds of dispute, together with details demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Court that the debt is disputed on bona fide substantial grounds such as to justify dismissal or stay of the petition.
  4. To the extent that a company wishes to rely on a cross-claim against the petitioner, the company has the burden of proving that that cross-claim is larger than the admitted debt of the petitioner or falls short of it by less than the statutory minimum for a petition claim (KY$100), and that the cross-claim is either undisputed or based on substantial grounds. Note, however, that there is no requirement to show that the cross-claim is bound to succeed.

In GBC, the company also sought an adjournment of the hearing on the basis that company officers were indisposed as a result of the COVID pandemic. However, whilst sympathetic to the real difficulties that can be caused by the pandemic, the Court found there was no proper basis for an adjournment, including for the following reasons:

  1. The company had failed to appoint Cayman attorneys (notwithstanding an express invitation to do so from the Court).
  2. The Company had filed no evidence to substantiate any of the reasons offered for seeking an adjournment.
  3. Unsubstantiated and unparticularised claims, in this case made by email, of incapacity to prepare for a hearing are an inadequate basis for an adjournment.
  4. Adjournment would result in prejudice to the petitioner.
Creditor petitions and attempts to adjourn in the times of COVID: In re GBC Oil Company Ltd

Leave A Comment